The tip of the ideasberg.

Greg Isenberg pitches a lot of business ideas — several per video, week after week. They are sharp, they are fast, and they are gone the moment the video ends. IdeasBerg catches them. Every idea from his public YouTube channel is extracted, written up, researched and scored, then filed under a category and a verdict so you can find the ones worth your time.

This is an unofficial, fan-made index. It is not affiliated with, sponsored by or endorsed by Greg Isenberg or his companies. The videos and the ideas in them belong to their creators; every idea page links to the exact source segment so you can watch the pitch in Greg’s own words.

Who runs it

IdeasBerg is built and operated by Squidcode, a small independent software studio. It started as an internal research tool — we kept wanting to go back to “that idea from that video” and could never find it — and grew into a public catalog. Questions, corrections and takedown requests go to the contact page.

How ideas are scored

Every analysis on this site is produced by the same pipeline, against the same rubric, so scores are comparable across ideas and across videos.

1. Source. A public video from Greg Isenberg’s channel. Each idea keeps a link to the segment it came from; nothing is invented that Greg did not pitch.
2. Extraction. The transcript is broken into discrete ideas — a title, a one-line summary and a primary category.
3. Research. Each idea is researched on the dimensions that decide whether it is worth building: market trend, comparable competitors, a plausible annual-revenue range, how much of the work can be automated, and how capital-efficient the model is.
4. Berg Score. Those findings are combined into a single 0–100 composite. A higher score means the research found stronger demand, a clearer path to revenue and a leaner build — not that the idea is “good” in the abstract.
5. Verdict. BUILD, MAYBE or SKIP, following from the score and the research findings. Verdict pages collect every take on a recurring theme so you can see where the rubric agrees and disagrees with itself over time.

The research and write-ups are generated with AI models following that fixed rubric, and scores are recomputed as new videos arrive. We do not hand-edit individual analyses to make an idea look better or worse. That consistency is the point — and it also means an analysis can be wrong. If you spot a factual error, a competitor we missed or a number that does not hold up, tell us and we will fix it.

None of this is financial, legal or investment advice. A BUILD verdict is a research signal, not a promise; do your own diligence before you start anything.

Builders

Some readers want an idea built rather than to build it themselves. The Builders section connects people with a brief to independent developers who have applied to take on projects. IdeasBerg makes the introduction; the work and the agreement are between you and the builder.